Skip to main content

🌐 CAP Theorem in Distributed Systems

📋 Executive Summary​

The CAP theorem, also known as Brewer's theorem, states that a distributed system can only provide two out of three guarantees simultaneously: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance. Understanding the CAP theorem is crucial for designing reliable distributed systems and making informed architecture decisions.

🎯 Overview and Problem Statement​

Definition​

The CAP theorem states that in a distributed system, you can only have two of these three properties:

  • Consistency (C): All nodes see the same data at the same time
  • Availability (A): Every request receives a response
  • Partition Tolerance (P): The system continues to operate despite network partitions

Business Impact​

  • Helps make informed architectural decisions
  • Guides system design trade-offs
  • Influences SLA definitions
  • Impacts customer experience and business operations

🏗️ Architecture & Core Concepts​

Visual Representation​

System Types​

  1. CP (Consistency/Partition Tolerance)

    • Sacrifices availability
    • Example: Traditional banking systems

  2. AP (Availability/Partition Tolerance)

    • Sacrifices consistency
    • Example: Social media feeds

  3. CA (Consistency/Availability)

    • Sacrifices partition tolerance
    • Example: Single-database systems
    • Not practical in distributed systems

💻 Technical Implementation​

Example: Implementing CP System​

public class CPSystem {
    private final List<Node> nodes;
    private final int requiredAcks;
    
    public boolean write(Data data) {
        int acks = 0;
        for (Node node : nodes) {
            try {
                boolean ack = node.writeData(data);
                if (ack) acks++;
            } catch (NetworkException e) {
                // Handle partition
                return false; // Sacrifice availability
            }
        }
        return acks >= requiredAcks;
    }
}

Example: Implementing AP System​

public class APSystem {
    private final List<Node> nodes;
    private final Queue<ReplicationEvent> replicationQueue;
    
    public boolean write(Data data) {
        // Write to local node immediately
        localNode.writeData(data);
        
        // Async replication
        replicationQueue.add(new ReplicationEvent(data));
        
        return true; // Always available
    }
    
    @Async
    private void processReplicationQueue() {
        while (true) {
            ReplicationEvent event = replicationQueue.poll();
            for (Node node : nodes) {
                try {
                    node.writeData(event.getData());
                } catch (NetworkException e) {
                    // Retry later
                    replicationQueue.add(event);
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

🤔 Decision Criteria & Evaluation​

When to Choose Each Type​

CP Systems​

  • Choose when:
    • Data consistency is critical (e.g., financial systems)
    • Temporary unavailability is acceptable
    • Strong consistency guarantees are required

AP Systems​

  • Choose when:
    • System must remain available
    • Eventually consistent data is acceptable
    • User experience prioritizes availability

Comparison Matrix​

AspectCP SystemsAP SystemsCA Systems
ConsistencyStrongEventualStrong
AvailabilityDuring partitionsAlwaysWhen no partitions
Use CasesBanking, InventorySocial Media, Content DeliverySingle-node systems
ComplexityHighMediumLow
ScalabilityLimitedHighLimited

⚠️ Anti-Patterns​

1. Ignoring Network Partitions​

❌ Wrong:

public class WrongSystem {
    public void write(Data data) {
        // Assuming network always works
        allNodes.forEach(node -> node.writeData(data));
    }
}

✅ Correct:

public class CorrectSystem {
    public WriteResult write(Data data) {
        int successfulWrites = 0;
        List<NetworkException> failures = new ArrayList<>();
        
        for (Node node : allNodes) {
            try {
                node.writeData(data);
                successfulWrites++;
            } catch (NetworkException e) {
                failures.add(e);
            }
        }
        
        return new WriteResult(successfulWrites, failures);
    }
}

2. Assuming Strong Consistency in AP Systems​

❌ Wrong:

// In an AP system
public Data readLatestData() {
    return nodes.get(0).readData(); // Assuming first node has latest data
}

✅ Correct:

public Data readDataWithVersion() {
    List<VersionedData> allVersions = nodes.stream()
        .map(Node::readVersionedData)
        .collect(Collectors.toList());
    return reconcileVersions(allVersions);
}

❓ FAQ​

1. Can I have all three: C, A, and P?​

No, mathematically proven impossible in asynchronous networks.

2. Is partition tolerance optional?​

No, network partitions will happen in distributed systems. You must handle them.

3. What's the difference between strong and eventual consistency?​

  • Strong: All reads return latest write
  • Eventual: All replicas converge over time

💡 Best Practices​

1. Design Principles​

  • Always design for partition tolerance
  • Choose consistency level based on business requirements
  • Implement proper monitoring
  • Use appropriate consistency models

2. Implementation Guidelines​

public interface DistributedSystem {
    // Clear consistency guarantees in interface
    WriteResult write(Data data, ConsistencyLevel level);
    ReadResult read(String key, ConsistencyLevel level);
    
    enum ConsistencyLevel {
        STRONG,
        EVENTUAL,
        CAUSAL
    }
}

📊 Real-world Use Cases​

1. Banking Systems (CP)​

  • Account balance updates
  • Transaction processing
  • Ledger management

2. Social Media (AP)​

  • News feeds
  • Status updates
  • Comment systems

3. E-commerce (Mixed)​

  • Product catalog (AP)
  • Inventory (CP)
  • User reviews (AP)

📚 References​

Books​

  • "Designing Data-Intensive Applications" by Martin Kleppmann
  • "Distributed Systems" by Maarten van Steen and Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Academic Papers​

  • "Brewer's Conjecture and the Feasibility of Consistent, Available, Partition-Tolerant Web Services" by Seth Gilbert and Nancy Lynch
  • "CAP Twelve Years Later: How the 'Rules' Have Changed" by Eric Brewer

Online Resources​